The redundancy process is heavily regulated. Violations, or alleged violations, of these regulations frequently give rise to complaints. Ultimately these end up at an Employment Tribunal.
If you're uncertain whether the redundancy procedure has been handled correctly, you can get clarity by using our free Redundancy Rights Checker.
Trying to Resolve Issues With Your Employer Directly
Before making a complaint to an Employment Tribunal, you should attempt to resolve matters with your employer directly. During the redundancy process, the company should normally offer some kind of appeal procedure to which you can make a complaint if, for example, you think you have been wrongly selected for redundancy.
If the internal appeal procedure is not applicable because, for example, you have already left your former employer, you should write to your employer setting out the terms of your complaint and asking for redress. You should wait at least 28 days for your employer to respond. If no response is received, you can then proceed to take the matter to an Employment Tribunal. Failing to properly explore the other avenues of appeal and complaint which were open to you in this way can lead to your petition to the Employment Tribunal being dismissed or any amount you are ultimately awarded being reduced.
How to Complain To An Employment Tribunal
To complain to an Employment Tribunal, you use the ET1 form. It is downloadable as a PDF file from the Employment Tribunal website. You can either print it out, fill it in and post it to your local Employment Tribunal or submit it electronically. You can also get a paper copy from any Jobcentre. Once you have submitted the form, you should get an acknowledgement that it has been received and be given a case number.

Describe what happened and find out whether you might have a case for unfair dismissal. Get clear guidance on your options and time limits.
Try our Unfair Dismissal Checker free, here on this site →Pre-Hearing Procedure
The Employment Tribunal will write to your employer, asking for a response to your complaint. If no response is received, the tribunal may issue a default judgement.
If a response is received, the dispute may be referred to the arbitration service ACAS. ACAS may attempt to facilitate an agreement between you and your employer. When this proves to be impossible, the matter will proceed towards a hearing.
If a hearing is going to take place, and there are still significant uncertainties about the case, the Employment Tribunal may request information from either party to the dispute. You can also ask for information from your employer if you think it is necessary to your case. A pre-hearing review of the case may also be held. You should be notified of this in writing and asked if you want to make written representations or attend in person.
Where your case requires witnesses and the witnesses are unwilling to attend, the Employment Tribunal can issue a Witness Order compelling them to come.
Employment Tribunal Hearing
You will be given at least two weeks’ notice of the hearing date. The hearing is not absolutely guaranteed to take place on this date because earlier cases may run longer than expected.
Employment Tribunal hearings are designed to be informal. The rules on procedure are far less strict than in conventional court rooms. Typically the hearing is presided over by a chairman and two lay members. The lay members are selected from pools of names suggested by trade unions and employers’ organisations. There will be one from each pool. Occasionally, a hearing will take place with only one lay member. This can only happen with your consent.
You do not need anyone to represent you at the hearing. However, you are entitled to be represented by whoever you like, whether a trade union representative, a lawyer, someone from the Citizens Advice Bureau or your cousin Pete.
During the hearing you will be allowed to say whatever you want and present or question any witnesses who are present. If you need advice on procedure, the tribunal staff will give it to you there and then.
Your situation may be slightly different. ask a question below ↓ and our editorial team will reply with our advice.
Employment Tribunal Verdict
After the hearing the panel will withdraw to consider their verdict then usually return a short time later to deliver it. The decision is reached by majority vote of the panel members. Reasons for the judgement will usually be given at the time.
If you do not accept the verdict, in some cases it is possible to lodge an appeal with the Employment Appeals Tribunal.
When the Employment Tribunal has found in your favour and awarded compensation to you, the amount should normally be paid to you directly by your employer within 42 days.
Redundancy Complaint Procedure – Conclusion
Most people find the idea of a legal hearing somewhat intimidating. But Employment Tribunals are deliberately designed to be accessible and fuss-free. If you have a valid complaint, therefore, don’t be deterred from pursuing it by fear of the formalities.
I've been told at risk after scored lowest in skill matrix among team of 3.
2 team leads carried out my scores. None is qualified in my profession. One we've never spoken or worked with each other.
Are the scores valid without any feedback from anyone, without 2nd review from either senor managers or HR?
Any ideas I can appeal to my manager or employer?
Thanks
I did ask about selection criteria pooling etc as being the senior with my own job title 75% of the role is similar at supervising level but was told no comparisons where made or scoring methods and it was restructuring as there was a downturn in business.
The other L&D Manager who in effect looks after the other sites that were merged with mine, is not under consultation, has less than 2 years service, was promoted under a DAS move that was not advertised 6 months ago. I was not part of the DAS selection as my managers for the last 3 years have not conducted any appraisals, mobility discussions etc so therefore not highlighted for a succession move. All my appraisals prior to the change of management were as a High performer which I have copies of. Does this make for an unfair dismissal claim, as the company did not follow their on processes?
His role title is General Manager which is different to mine since appointment he's been learning from me and trying to asking for detailed information about what and how I do what I do so he can make sure others in India are following the process (which is what I was doing).
Am I right in assuming, that if my role is at risk of redundancy, his role should be too; and that at the very least this should be acknowledge during consulation?
Now looking again at my job description it describes a new post on the restructure, does that mean that legally I cannot be made redundant? I have been told my a colleague that I may have a case for unfair dismissal but I'm not sure can you help please?
I was advised last Thursday that my job was at risk (along with 11 others), yesterday I went to a consultation meeting to discuss redundancy etc. I was advised that no one would be doing my role in my absence and that they were restructuring the company and that the role would be shared by project managers. Today I have learnt that they have employed a freelancer to cover my role...so this means what they advised me yesterday was a lie, do I have any come back on this? Any advice would be gratefully received.
Many thanks.
By choosing this approach and :
- not informing the small handful of people actually impacted before the meeting
- not setting a definite end time by which all those impacted would be informed
- not sending an email to the sub team confirming that all those impacted had now been informed
did the employer contravene the Health And Safety at Work Act which requires that it should always seek to minimise workplace stress ?
Is this allowable that he can be made redundant when his position is still there, and be replaced by another employee from the same company who has no skills for this position.
Thank you
Thanks
The letter stated that the meeting was in respect of the fact that organisation no longer requires the role of Administration and Finance Officer in its structure going forward and as I have less than 2 years service in total the organisation is not obliged to consult me in respect of a redundancy situation. The letter also stated that one of the possible outcomes of the formal meeting could be the termination of my employment.
I have been working for this organisation for 23 months and I will be 2 years on 15 June 2016. There was no consultation about my role no longer needed in the organisation. I have just come back from 2 weeks sick leave due to miscarriage happened on 22/04/16 and my employer was aware of my situation until after 2 weeks returned back to work. I receive a shocking letter left on my work desk. Since of the shock of redundancy, it has broken me mentally, physically and emotionally. everyday I suffer from panick attacks.
Could you please advise me on this matter.
Thanks in advance
Ask Redundancy Expert a question
Ask our editorial team a question and we will reply with our advice. Tell us as much about your situation as you can: the more detail you give, the more useful our answer can be.
You do not need to use your real name. Please do not include your full address, phone number, email address, or the names of other people. We may edit or remove identifying details for privacy and legal reasons.
Comments are moderated before publication.