Redundancy and Disability: Your Rights at Work
Around one in five working age adults in the UK has a disability, according to recent figures. If you are disabled and facing redundancy, you have specific legal protections that your employer must follow. Understanding these rights can help you spot when something has gone wrong and know what steps to take.
Redundancy can be stressful for anyone. For disabled workers, there may be added concerns about finding new employment or whether a disability has unfairly influenced the decision. The law sets out clear rules about how employers should handle redundancy when disabled employees are involved.
Legal Protection Under the Equality Act 2010
The Equality Act 2010 makes it unlawful for employers to discriminate against employees because of a disability. This protection applies throughout employment, including during redundancy processes.
Your employer cannot use your disability as a reason to select you for redundancy. Doing so could amount to direct discrimination, though any claim would need to be supported by evidence and assessed through proper legal processes. The law also protects against indirect discrimination, where a policy or practice puts disabled employees at a disadvantage compared to others.
To qualify for protection under the Act, a disability must have a substantial and long term effect on your ability to carry out normal daily activities. Long term generally means lasting, or likely to last, 12 months or more. Many conditions are covered, including physical impairments, mental health conditions, learning disabilities and some long term illnesses.
Certain conditions are automatically treated as disabilities under the Act from the point of diagnosis. These include cancer, HIV and multiple sclerosis. Other conditions may also qualify, so check the Equality Act itself or seek professional advice for a full picture.

Answer a few questions about your situation and find out whether your redundancy is fair and legal. Get clear guidance on your rights in under two minutes.
Try our Redundancy Rights Checker free, here on this site →Reasonable Adjustments During Redundancy
Employers must make reasonable adjustments for disabled employees throughout the redundancy process, not just during ordinary working life.
Reasonable adjustments might include:
- Holding consultation meetings in accessible locations
- Providing information in different formats, such as large print or audio
- Allowing extra time to consider proposals and respond
- Permitting a support worker or companion to attend meetings
- Adjusting the timing or format of meetings to accommodate health needs
- Making changes to selection criteria that would otherwise disadvantage disabled employees
What counts as reasonable will depend on the circumstances. Factors include the size of the employer, the cost of the adjustment, and how practical it would be to implement. A large company will generally be expected to do more than a small business.
Your employer should discuss potential adjustments with you. If you need specific support during the redundancy process, let them know as early as possible.
Your situation may be slightly different. ask a question below ↓ and our editorial team will reply with our advice.
Fair Selection Criteria
When selecting employees for redundancy, employers must use fair and objective criteria. These criteria should not put disabled employees at a disadvantage without good reason.
Using attendance records as a selection factor could disadvantage someone whose absences relate to their disability. In such cases, employers may need to discount disability related absences or adjust how they apply the criteria.
Similarly, performance based criteria might need adjustment if a disability has affected someone's output, particularly if reasonable adjustments were not in place during the assessment period.
Employers should review their selection criteria carefully to check for any unintended discrimination. If you believe the criteria used have unfairly counted against you because of your disability, this may be grounds for a claim.
What to Do If You Think You Have Been Treated Unfairly
If you believe your disability has influenced your selection for redundancy, or that your employer has failed to make reasonable adjustments, there are steps you can take.
Start by raising your concerns through your employer's internal grievance procedure. Consider seeking advice from a solicitor or trade union representative at this stage. Put your complaint in writing and keep copies of all correspondence. Sometimes issues can be resolved internally without further action.
If internal processes do not resolve the matter, you may be able to bring a claim to an employment tribunal. Claims for disability discrimination must usually be started within three months less one day from the act you are complaining about. Before making a tribunal claim, you must notify Acas and go through early conciliation. This service is free and can extend the time limit for making a claim if you start conciliation within the original deadline.
Free advice is available from several sources. Acas offers guidance on workplace disputes and can help with conciliation. Citizens Advice provides information on employment rights and discrimination. The Equality and Human Rights Commission website has detailed resources on disability discrimination law.
You can check current redundancy pay rates and rules on GOV.UK, which also has information on your rights if you are facing redundancy.
Legal aid may be available for some discrimination cases depending on your circumstances. If your case is complex or you are unsure of your position, getting advice from a qualified employment solicitor or a trade union representative can help you understand your options before deciding how to proceed.
I have been offered a demotion but the same position in the company pays more than I’m being offered is this legal
Kind regards
JJ
I suffered the Works back injury in 2016 October tripping over Airlines on the floor with a 3 metre combination ladder in my hands it's left me disabled with a chronic back condition and other issues.I've been off ever since apart from 3 months of hell when I tried to go back too work because of financial reasons to support my family.so on the 20th of March 2017 I returned I wasn't signed off fit for work but the production said it was ok I could go back 4 hours a day.too my horror they put me on a machine where I was bending down constantly and walking from front to back of the machine to load and unload it.i told them the machine was killing me my back could not take it.they said its all they could offer me and left me like it i broke down 20th of June 2017 in the HR office and said i cant take it anymore.I've been off ever since I receive the p i p, industrial injuries benefit,blue badge holder my life has been a living hell.after 20 years employment with my company I've just found out that this Wednesday coming 15th March 2018 the HR manager along with the Union representation are coming to my home to wrap up my employment.after my accident I suffer post-traumatic stress disorder depression anxiety and depression I've even had thoughts of ending it all.the Works insurance have been nothing more than vile sending me everywhere spinal specialist psychiatrists psychologists counsellors not too offer me any help,but just too gather reports on me for my employer but they didn't like the findings they received.My employer has broke me.I have an injury compensation claim against my employer through unite union.but the solicitors for the union said my case is difficult and complex after my employer denied liability for my accident.im broken man too top it off after 20 years service they're going to let me go.have you any advice please
regards JJ
Is this correct - do I have a right to insist on this person not being there?
Last month my employer announced redundancies effecting my team, and we are now awaiting their final decision.
During consultations, I was asked if I wanted to volunteer for redundancy, and was told that if I didn't volunteer, but was selected for redundancy, I would have to work some/all of my notice period, whereas volunteers would not have to work any of it.
After viewing the proposed changes to my team, especially the shift patterns, it seemed clear to me that, due to disabilities, I wouldn't be able to cope with the new structure - the only part-time post was for 18 hours over 2 days, and due to fatigue, I struggle to work even a 6 hour shift. I currently work 16 hours over 3 days. When I asked over the flexibility of the proposed hours, I was told that they were not set in stone, but the needs of the business dictated they be similar to the proposal.
Given that I don't think I would 'fit' into the new structure, I felt/feel it very likely I will be made redundant. Given that, I felt pressured into volunteering, else be penalised by having to work my notice period. It seems wrong that they can use the volunteering process to manipulate people.
However, my main question is regarding the redundancy payment.
I have worked at the company 12 years (13 once you include the notice period). I started as a full time employee in full health, but after about 5 years, my health began to decline. I gradually cut my hour's as my health dictated, first to 30 hours a week, then 18 hours, and I now work 16 hours a week.
My redundancy payment has been calculated based on these 16 hours. So my question is this - because I have only reduced my hours because of disability, is there any DDA-type law which will make my employer take my time worked as a full-time employee into account when calculating my redundancy payment?
Any information/advice you can offer would be appreciated.
Ask Redundancy Expert a question
Ask our editorial team a question and we will reply with our advice. Tell us as much about your situation as you can: the more detail you give, the more useful our answer can be.
You do not need to use your real name. Please do not include your full address, phone number, email address, or the names of other people. We may edit or remove identifying details for privacy and legal reasons.
Comments are moderated before publication.